For Arizonans facing housing discrimination, the Southwest Fair Housing Council can be the difference between securing a home and being left with nowhere to turn.
Its staff help parents rejected by landlords, disabled tenants seeking accommodations, and thousands of other residents navigating a system that rarely favors people without legal support.
For decades, grants from the Department of Housing and Urban Development have sustained that work.
Executive Director Jay Young called the Fair Housing Initiatives Program “the cornerstone of our funding,” but the second Trump administration has repeatedly placed those grants in jeopardy through delays, restrictions, and bureaucratic gamesmanship.
When the council’s three year grant expired last June, HUD had not issued the notice needed to seek another award.
Young laid off four of eight employees, leaving the remaining staff struggling to answer calls, investigate complaints, and guide residents through the evidence required to challenge discrimination.
A lawsuit eventually forced the administration to accept applications, and the council secured new grants in April.
Young hired three employees, including one person previously dismissed, but rebuilding expertise takes time, and the organization had not returned to its former capacity by late August.
The danger now reaches far beyond Arizona. HUD has added conditions to its fiscal year 2026 funding notices that civil rights advocates say could disqualify most of the nonprofit groups responsible for enforcing federal housing protections, conveniently accomplishing through paperwork what Trump officials would struggle to defend openly.
Private Enforcement Initiative grants support 82 organizations that handled roughly three quarters of the nation’s 32,321 housing discrimination complaints in 2024.
HUD processed less than 5 percent, while state and local agencies handled about 21 percent, making nonprofit enforcement the backbone of the entire system.
One new condition bars organizations from applying if they received grants in fiscal years 2023 or 2024.
Since these grants typically last three years, groups seeking renewed funding after a 2023 award are automatically caught by the restriction. “Effectively, they are disqualifying all of the recipients,” attorney Sasha Samberg Champion said.
HUD also says its grants cannot account for more than half of an organization’s operating budget.
“That has everybody in a panic,” Samberg Champion said, because many fair housing groups were built around the federal program and lack wealthy donors capable of replacing public funding at a moment’s notice.
For heavily dependent organizations, the requirement “almost by definition means they’re going to shut down,” Samberg Champion said.
The National Fair Housing Alliance has sued, arguing that the administration is dismantling a program that survived previous Democratic and Republican governments in largely the same form.
HUD defended its conduct with the familiar language of fiscal responsibility.
“HUD stands behind the lawfulness of its NOFOs which reaffirm HUD’s commitment to its stewardship of taxpayer dollars,” a spokesperson said, offering a polished bureaucratic defense while community organizations confront layoffs, delayed services, and possible closure.
The administration previously tried to redirect fiscal year 2025 grants toward universities and entities focused on technical efficiency rather than enforcement, investigation, education, or outreach.
A judge vacated those notices and ordered HUD to use the 2024 structure, though the administration has signaled that it may pursue further legal options.
Meanwhile, enforcement has cratered. Between January and July 2025, HUD approved settlements worth less than $20,000, compared with between $4 million and $8 million annually in earlier years, while civil and criminal charges fell to four from a previous yearly average of 25.
The human consequences are not abstract. Disability discrimination represented about 55 percent of complaints in 2024, including cases involving wheelchair users denied accessible apartments, while racial discrimination accounted for about 16 percent and sex discrimination, including sexual harassment, made up about 7 percent.
Young fears another funding interruption in 2027 could force him to dismiss half his staff again and push the council toward collapse.
“The deck is stacked against people when they don’t have a fair housing organization or an attorney to help them,” he said. Without those advocates, “People are going to be on their own.”
Join the Discussion
COMMENTS POLICY: We have no tolerance for messages of violence, racism, vulgarity, obscenity or other such discourteous behavior. Thank you for contributing to a respectful and useful online dialogue.